|
Post by austin on Jul 6, 2011 14:50:20 GMT -5
Do you think soccer can be counted as aggressive or dangerous because it involves kicking that the potential of being hit?
I would say no, as they have to many rules and there is always some sort of issue if you do get aggressive..
|
|
|
Post by Apeman711 on Jul 6, 2011 17:57:40 GMT -5
No. I would say it's the opposite of aggressive, as hitting someone practically gets you a red card.
|
|
zaborg
Just Drafted
[M0:0]
Posts: 3
|
Post by zaborg on Aug 2, 2011 17:04:10 GMT -5
It is. I recently saw a photograph of some soccer player and his ankle was like turned 180 degrees. And people keep flying and flying during the game, lol... And they spit a lot, too...
|
|
|
Post by 2091401 on Aug 3, 2011 2:30:33 GMT -5
It definitely has potential to be, but only because of the sport itself. Think about it, it's a sport in which two teams try to get the ball and score it, only with their feet, and both are trying at the same time. It's pretty much guaranteed to get aggressive at times, but I think they do a good job in trying to prevent it from getting too aggressive.
|
|
|
Post by Homerunsox2005 on Aug 3, 2011 15:02:13 GMT -5
It's a pretty aggressive game, but not very dangerous. There are many rules preventing it from being dangerous.
|
|
|
Post by vinexinfo on Jan 11, 2012 1:52:29 GMT -5
No, its not aggressive. But have little danger. This game is played with some set of rules that prevents it to be aggressive.
|
|